This is what happens when the bank recipients of Treasury bailout largesse
withhold credit:
Workers who got three days' notice that their factory was shutting its doors have occupied the building and say they won't go home without assurances they'll get severance and vacation pay.
About 250 union workers occupied the Republic Windows and Doors plant in shifts Saturday while union leaders outside criticized a Wall Street bailout they say is leaving laborers behind.
Leah Fried, an organizer with the United Electrical Workers, said the Chicago-based vinyl window manufacturer failed to give 60 days' notice required by law before shutting down.
[...]
Fried said the company can't pay its 300 employees because its creditor, Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America, won't let them.
Bank of America received $25 billion from the government's financial bailout package. The company said in a statement Saturday that it isn't responsible for Republic's financial obligations to its employees.
Good on the employees for making the brave choice of simply taking over the factory, a pattern of resistance most recently seen earlier in the decade during
Argentina's financial crisis:
When the economy collapsed here 18 months ago, the situation was so bad that the owners of many factories simply shut their doors and walked away, in most cases owing their employees months and months of back pay. Rather than accept that situation, workers -- backed by neighborhood associations and left-wing groups enamored with the idea of ''people's capitalism'' -- have sometimes been able to persuade bankruptcy courts to let them take over the company's assets.
Simply shuttering the factory doors is not allowing for a more orderly transition for these employees to seek other employment. It will be interesting to see if U.S. Bankruptcy judges follow the Argentine example here, since our Latin American brethren have far more experience with economic "shock doctrine" than we do.
Bank of America is making a strong case for being taken over by Federal banking regulators. You cannot just squander $25 billion in taxpayer proceeds by keeping your powder dry, which is exactly what BofA is doing here. A bank's job is to
lend money, when it ceases to do that, it ceases to do business.
If Bank of America can make the bold statement that it's not responsible for financial obligations to a creditor's employees, than why are taxpayers responsible for BofA's financial obligations?
Update: Lest this post simply be interpreted as "class warfare" pitting employers against workers, that's not the case, as even Chicago-area manufacturers are
no fans of the banks:
The crisis at Republic may soon spread to other Chicago manufacturers. Meinster says Republic is a cornerstone among Goose Island businesses, and is not alone in having financial problems.
“That could be 50,000 jobs here in the city if the banks allow these manufacturers to go down,” Meinster says.
Glenn Johnson, a member of the board of directors of of the Illinois Manufacturers Association, agrees.
"I'm hearing horror stories about banks coming in and saying, 'It's been a great relationship and we'll miss you, but we just don't like your numbers, and we're just not going to renew your line of credit,"' says Johnson, who also served as chairman of the organization.
One wonders, are Portland metro area manufacturers in any better shape? How about that window manufacturer down the road?